Skip to content
Stakeline
NetworkValidatorsLiquid StakingRewards CalculatorGovernance
Stakeline

Solana validator rates and commission, liquid staking tokens, live network health, and on-chain governance proposals.

Pages

NetworkValidatorsLiquid StakingRewards CalculatorGovernance

Data sources

  • StakewizValidator set, commission, uptime, APY
  • DefiLlamaLiquid staking rates and TVL
  • JupiterSOL price and token metadata
  • MarinadeClient software and delegator counts
  • IBRLBlock-building quality scores
  • HeliusEpoch, fees, and on-chain reads

Rates are measured over a recent window and change every epoch. Not financial advice.

© 2026 Stakeline

Governance

Every proposal with the stake behind it: who supported it, how each ballot split, and what passed, read straight from the governance program on chain.

Proposals
3
On chain, all phases
Open ballots
0
Nothing to vote on
Gathering supportA proposal needs a share of cluster stake behind it before a vote is scheduled. Nothing has been voted on in this phase.
0
No ballot scheduled yet
Current epochThe account cannot distinguish a scheduled ballot from an open one: both read voting=true. The current epoch is what separates them.
1,072
Phases resolve against this

ClosedOutcome derived from locked tallies

SGP-0003Rejected

SGP-0003: Resource and Inclusion Fee

Ballot
1,021–1,024

This SGP asks validators and delegators to endorse restructuring Solana's base transaction fee into a fixed base inclusion fee paid to the block leader and a separate resource fee that scales with requested transaction cost and is 100% burned. A "yes" is a mandate to pursue that fee model; the detailed mechanism is specified in [SIMD-0553][simd-0553].

On the ballot**Should Solana adopt a base inclusion fee plus a burned resource fee that scales with requested cost units, as specified in SIMD-0553?** Options: For / Against / Abstain

For53.9%142.84M SOL
Against18.9%50.15M SOL
Abstain27.2%72.03M SOL
61.1% of the stake snapshot has voted
Voters and detail →Read the proposal ↗On governance.solana.com ↗
SGP-0002Approved

SGP-0002: Double Disinflation

Ballot
1,021–1,024

Adds SGP-0002, which asks validators and delegators to endorse doubling Solana's annual disinflation rate from 15% to 30%

For67.0%176.29M SOL
Against25.2%66.19M SOL
Abstain7.8%20.63M SOL
60.7% of the stake snapshot has voted
Voters and detail →
SGP-0001Approved

SGP-0001: The Solana Constitution

Ballot
1,021–1,024

A "yes" vote on this SGP ratifies The Solana Constitution — the canonical document governing Solana's network-level decision-making. Ratification activates the on-chain governance machinery (svmgov) and the governance processes outlined in the Constitution, with the goal of creating a stake-weighted-endorsed source of truth for Solana.

For86.0%193.65M SOL
Against2.1%4.63M SOL
Abstain12.0%26.97M SOL
52.0% of the stake snapshot has voted

svmgov programEpoch 1072just now

How to read this

Support is not a vote

A proposal first has to gather a share of cluster stake behind it. Only then is a ballot scheduled. Validators expressing support and validators casting votes are different populations, and only the first exists before a ballot opens.

The outcome is derived, not read

The program stores no verdict. Finalizing a proposal locks the tallies and nothing else. Approved and Rejected here are this site applying the published two-thirds rule to those totals. If governance.solana.com ever disagrees, they are right and this is wrong.

Stake is measured at a snapshot

Vote weights come from a stake snapshot taken at a fixed slot, not from live stake. The snapshot total is not published on chain, so participation is only shown for proposals whose total has been recorded by hand, never borrowed from another proposal.

Read the proposal ↗
On governance.solana.com ↗
Voters and detail →Read the proposal ↗On governance.solana.com ↗